As the New Brunswick EMR dream of “One Patient, One Record” continues to unravel and costs skyrocket there is growing recognition outside of the realm of the New Brunswick Medical Society that the key to successful and meaningful use of electronic medical records lies in getting disparate systems to talk to each other. It is abundantly clear that we need a variety of EMR software packages to fit a variety of physician needs, and that these products need to be able to exchange data with a minimum of fuss and bother.
Achieving this might be akin to finding the Holy Grail, at least according to a recent article by Dr. Eric Cadesky of Vancouver, published in the June 2015 edition of “Future Practice.” The analogy fits to a degree, but a better analogy might be finding the Rosetta Stone, the original “interoperability engine.”
You can read the full article here: Interoperability: The Holy Grail of EMR’s
The message is clear, and there is a rising tide of voices opposed to the suppression of information sharing as exemplified by the curiously named Data Sharing Agreement between the New Brunswick government and the New Brunswick Medical Society.
Time to step back and rethink the plan. Blindly pursuing a model which relies on a single EMR vendor runs counter to what is best for patients and the medical community. We need interoperability, and the sooner the better. If we are to make any progress toward that goal, we need buy-in on the part of the NBMS and the New Brunswick government.
Sadly, we have neither.